What Caught Our Eye
- Gianmaria Buccellati replaced silver with white gold when he took over creative direction, then combined traditional openwork with the house’s honeycomb technique.
- A 1968 bracelet in yellow and white gold with brilliant-cut diamonds is cited as a defining example of his geometric openwork interpretation.
- The Serenissima collection draws directly on Venetian lace traditions and the ruffled collars depicted in 16th- and 17th-century Renaissance portraits.
- The honeycomb technique gives the pieces flexibility, allowing necklaces and collars to fit closely around the neck.
- A pair of 1970 earrings is highlighted as proof that the openwork approach produced results with a contemporary sensibility even decades ago.
The Serenissima Foundation: Venice and the Renaissance
The Serenissima collection takes its name and character from two distinct but related sources: the delicate textile traditions of Venice and the painted portraiture of the Italian Renaissance. Venetian lace, prized across Europe for its intricate lightness, gave BUCCELLATI‘s artisans a structural vocabulary to work with in precious metal. The openwork technique that results from this influence creates negative space within the gold itself, producing pieces that appear far lighter than their material would suggest.
The second layer of inspiration comes from portraiture produced during the 16th and 17th centuries. The ruffled collars that appear in those paintings, stiff with embroidered fabric yet visually elaborate, became a reference point for translating textile volume into wearable gold structures. Renaissance engraving methods also informed the surface treatment, connecting the collection to a broader Italian craft lineage that predates the modern luxury industry by several centuries.
Gianmaria Buccellati and the Honeycomb Technique
When Gianmaria Buccellati assumed creative direction of the house, his first significant material decision was to replace silver with white gold across the openwork pieces. This shifted the collection’s visual register while preserving the fine, almost textile-like quality of the earlier work. He then introduced the honeycomb technique alongside the openwork, creating a dual-method approach that became one of BUCCELLATI’s most recognised contributions to high jewellery construction.
The practical effect of combining these two methods is evident in the pieces themselves. The honeycomb structure gives flexibility to forms that might otherwise be rigid, allowing a collar or necklace to move with the wearer rather than sitting stiffly against the skin. Up close, the result is described as a luminous arabesque, a geometric pattern with the visual character of lacework rather than cast metal. Lucrezia Buccellati, presenting the collection’s archive pieces in the official Buccellati Talks film, points to these qualities as the defining feature of Gianmaria’s interpretation of the Serenissima style.
The 1968 Bracelet and 1970 Earrings
Two archive pieces anchor the discussion. The 1968 bracelet in yellow and white gold, set with brilliant-cut diamonds and worked in geometric openwork, is described as a precise expression of Gianmaria’s approach: the dual metal combination creates contrast, while the diamond setting catches light through the open lattice. It sits not as a historical curiosity but as a legible design statement with clear contemporary relevance.
The 1970 earrings make a different argument. Where the bracelet demonstrates formal mastery of the technique, the earrings show that Gianmaria was also pushing the openwork in a more forward-looking direction. Their design is described as contemporary, suggesting that the vocabulary he established was flexible enough to shift register across different jewellery categories without losing coherence. For collectors drawn to Italian high jewellery from this period, both pieces represent the kind of archival depth that distinguishes BUCCELLATI from newer houses. Comparable European jewellery maisons such as CHAUMET have similarly mined their own archives to anchor contemporary collections, though the technical methods differ considerably.
Why It Matters
For GCC collectors with an interest in Italian high jewellery, the Serenissima collection offers a well-documented lineage that connects specific technical methods (the honeycomb technique and openwork) to identifiable historical sources in Venetian craft and Renaissance painting. BUCCELLATI has outlined the full background of the collection’s lace inspiration in the official Buccellati Talks film, making the creative rationale accessible alongside the pieces themselves. For those weighing Italian jewellery houses, this level of documented craft reasoning carries weight in a market that increasingly values provenance as much as aesthetics.
Stay ahead of the latest releases. Subscribe to our newsletter for editor-curated coverage of luxury timepieces and jewellery across the GCC.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the honeycomb technique used in BUCCELLATI's Serenissima collection?
The honeycomb technique is a BUCCELLATI method that Gianmaria Buccellati combined with traditional openwork to make pieces both flexible and capable of fitting closely to the body. It is described as the house's signature enchanting technique.
What inspired Gianmaria Buccellati when he developed the Serenissima jewellery style?
Gianmaria drew on the lightness of Venetian laces, Renaissance engraving methods, and specifically the ruffled collars visible in 16th- and 17th-century Renaissance portraits, translating these references into geometric openwork designs in yellow and white gold.
Where can I learn more about the Serenissima collection and its lace inspiration?
The full story is explored in the official Buccellati Talks video series, including Part 2 featuring Lucrezia Buccellati, available on the official BUCCELLATI YouTube channel.

